Persistent regional inequalities and productivity in Northeast Brazil: simulation-based evidence for the 2030 Agenda

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61673/ren.2027.3213

Keywords:

Productivity shocks, Income inequality reduction, regional simulation

Abstract

Using the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the 2030 Agenda as a reference framework, this paper assesses whether productivity gains and reductions in income inequality are sufficient to accelerate economic convergence and improve social outcomes in Brazil’s Northeast. To do so, we employ a state-level adaptation of the International Futures (IFs) model to simulate alternative development scenarios for Brazilian states through 2030. The results indicate that productivity-enhancing policies generate substantial gains in economic growth and contribute to reducing poverty, particularly when combined with more equitable income distribution. Nevertheless, regional disparities remain remarkably persistent. Even under the most optimistic scenario, no Northeastern state reaches 75% of the national per capita GDP by 2030, a benchmark commonly associated with regional convergence policies. While extreme poverty declines significantly, it is not fully eradicated. These findings suggest that broad-based productivity and equity improvements, although necessary, are insufficient to overcome longstanding territorial inequalities. Achieving the SDGs in a highly heterogeneous country such as Brazil requires place-based regional development policies capable of addressing structural constraints and fostering stronger economic convergence across regions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Bruno de Oliveira Cruz, Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada

Bruno Cruz holds a bachelor's and a master's degree in Economics from the University of Brasília (UnB), completed in 1994 and 1997, respectively, and a Ph.D. from the Université Catholique de Louvain (Belgium, 2005). Since 1996, he has worked as a Research and Planning Technician at the Institute for Applied Economic Research (IPEA), focusing on topics such as embodied technological progress, real options, irreversible investment, investment theory, economic growth, development, and regional economics.

Since 2020, he has been a faculty member at the School of Public Policy and Government of the Getúlio Vargas Foundation (EPPG/FGV) in Brasília, where he contributes his academic expertise and applied research experience.

Carlos Wagner Albuquerque Oliveira, Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada

Economista. Doutor em Economia. Técnico de Planejamento e Pesquisa. Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada – IPEA. W4 Sul 702, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brasil, 70390-025.

References

ALLEN, C.; METTERNICHT, G.; WIEDMANN, T. National pathways to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): a comparative review of scenario modelling tools. Environmental Science & Policy, v. 66, p. 199-207, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.09.008.

ALY, E.; ELSAWAH, S.; RYAN, M. J. A review and catalogue to the use of models in enabling the achievement of sustainable development goals (SDG). Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 340, art. 130803, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130803.

AMORIM, A. L.; SCALCO, P. R.; BRAGA, M. J. Crescimento econômico e convergência de renda nos estados brasileiros: uma análise a partir dos grandes setores da economia. Revista Econômica do Nordeste, v. 39, n. 3, p. 359-370, 2008.

AZZONI, C. R. Economic growth and regional income inequality in Brazil. The Annals of Regional Science, v. 35, p. 133-152, 2001.

BABATUNDE, K. A.; BEGUM, R. A.; SAID, F. F. Application of computable general equilibrium (CGE) to climate change mitigation policy: a systematic review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, v. 78, p. 61-71, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.04.064.

BARRO, R. J.; SALA-I-MARTIN, X. Economic growth. 2. ed. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2004.

BÖHRINGER, C.; LÖSCHEL, A. Computable general equilibrium models for sustainability impact assessment: status quo and prospects. Ecological Economics, v. 60, n. 1, p. 49-64, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.03.006.

COLLSTE, D.; PEDERCINI, M.; CORNELL, S. E. Policy coherence to achieve the SDGs: using integrated simulation models to assess effective policies. Sustainability Science, v. 12, n. 6, p. 921-931, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-017-0457-x.

CRUZ, B; MELO, J. A. D.; SILVA FILHO, L.; RIBEIRO, L. Política Nacional de Desenvolvimento Regional: monitoramento e avaliação de impactos dos fundos constitucionais. Brasília: Ipea: MIDR, 2025. v. 1. DOI: https://dx.doi. org/10.38116/978-65-5635-083-7.

CRUZ, B.; SILVA FILHO, L.; MELO, J.; RIBEIRO, L. C. S. Dinâmicas espaciais e estruturais na agricultura brasileira: análises comparativas dos períodos 2013-2017 e 2018-2022. Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural, v. 63, e290289, 2025.

DOMINGUES, E.; PEROBELLI, G.; LUZ, G.; MAGALHÃES, A. Economic and environmental trade-offs of sustainable fuel policies in Brazil. [S.l.], 2026. (Working Paper/Discussion Paper). Disponível em: https://biblioteca.ibge.gov.br/visualizacao/livros/liv102240.pdf.

HUGHES, B. B. et al. International Futures (IFs) training manual. Denver: University of Denver Press, 2015. (Working Paper, n. 2015.04.02). Disponível em: https://korbel.du.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/International-Futures-IFs-Training-Manual.pdf.

HUGHES, B. B. Scenario analysis with International Futures (IFs). Denver: University of Denver Press, 2005. (Working Paper, n. 2005.12.12).

IBGE – INSTITUTO BRASILEIRO DE GEOGRAFIA E ESTATÍSTICA. Síntese de indicadores sociais: uma análise das condições de vida da população brasileira: 2025. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE, 2025. Disponível em: https://biblioteca.ibge.gov.br/visualizacao/livros/liv102240.pdf.

JOUVENEL, H. de. Futuribles: origins, philosophy and practices – anticipation for action. World Future Review, v. 11, n. 1, p. 8-18, 2019.

KLUCK, T.; LI, C.; PRADHAN, P. A systematic review highlights the need for holistic modeling of the Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainable Development, v. 33, n. 6, p. 8398-8413, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.70096.

RIBEIRO, L. C. S.; DOMINGUES, E. P.; PEROBELLI, F. S.; HEWINGS, G. J. D. Structuring investment and regional inequalities in the Brazilian Northeast. Regional Studies, v. 52, n. 5, p. 727-739, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2017.1331294.

SOARES, S. A. et al. Alcances, limites e antinomias de métodos e técnicas em cenários prospectivos. Brasília: Ipea, 2019. (Texto para Discussão, n. 2443).

SOUZA, T. A. A. de; CUNHA, M. S. da. Performance of Brazilian total factor productivity from 2004 to 2014: a sectoral and regional analysis. Journal of Economic Structures, v. 7, n. 24, p. 1-18, 2018.

VAN SOEST, H. L.; VAN VUUREN, D. P.; HILAIRE, J.; MINX, J. C.; HARMSEN, M. J. H. M.; KREY, V.; POPP, A.; RIAHI, K.; LUDERER, G. Analysing interactions among Sustainable Development Goals with Integrated Assessment Models. Global Transitions, v. 1, p. 210-225, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glt.2019.10.004.

Published

2026-08-14

How to Cite

Cruz, B. de O., & Oliveira, C. W. A. (2026). Persistent regional inequalities and productivity in Northeast Brazil: simulation-based evidence for the 2030 Agenda. Revista Econômica Do Nordeste, e20273213. https://doi.org/10.61673/ren.2027.3213

Issue

Section

Artigos